Roscoe Tanner vs John Austin Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs J. Austin

Roscoe Tanner

USA

4

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

John Austin

USA

4

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Tanner 4 - 0 Austin

They have played 8 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 8 and John Austin winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and John Austin was at the Los Angeles, 12-04-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 7-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	4
Austin	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Los Angeles(04-12-82)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

John Austin

(R2) San Francisco(09-25-78)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

John Austin

(R4) New Orleans(08-06-78)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

John Austin

R. Tanner vs J. Austin H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Austin
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	46.11% (83-97)
1	Hard	0
3	Indoor	0
17	Titles	1
4	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs J. Austin Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while John Austin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while John Austin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas John Austin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with John Austin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/ 59). John Austin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 51/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 31% (W/L 8/ 18).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as John Austin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 4 times and John Austin being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 8 and John Austin winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and John Austin was at the Los Angeles, 12-04-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 7-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while John Austin has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while John Austin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and John Austin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs John Austin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs J. Austin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Austin
4	H2H Matches Won	0
8	Sets Won	0
54	Games Won	42
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (4/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/4)
100% (4/4)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/4)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/4)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Austin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
La Quinta - 24-02-1986
R2 Andre AgassiA. Agassi	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Auckland - 09-01-1984
R3 Steve GuyS. Guy	L	7-6 6-3	Stats
Perth CH - 02-01-1984
R3 Jerome VanierJ. Vanier	L	7-5 7-6	Stats
Adelaide - 19-12-1983
R3 Loic CourteauL. Courteau	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Australian Open - 29-11-1983
R1 Brad DrewettB. Drewett	L	7-6 6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs J. Austin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Austin
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	46.11% (83/97)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	45.92% (197/232)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	48.34% (1978/2114)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	54.26% (51/43)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	47.83% (11/12)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	35.14% (13/24)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	30.77% (8/18)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	580.67
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	35.29% (6/11)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	14.29% (1/6)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	40.52% (47/69)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	72.50% (29/11)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (77/163)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	35% (6/17)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	33% (1/3)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (24/44)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (86/71)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (86/15)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (94/12)